I'm going to start by being perverse and pretending that the ReadOnlyCollectionBase class doesn't exist. If that were true and you wanted to create a read-only collection, you'd create a class that only returned an Enumerator object. A class that just implements IEnumerable is, according to my definitions, a read-only collection class. Generating t
It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are al
driisdriis 163k4545 gold badges268268 silver badges343343 bronze badges 3 Sorry, but even now there are plenty of uses for library code to use IList (non-generic). Anyone who says otherwise hasn't suffered enough reflection / data-binding / etc ;)Today, you almost always use IList, the primary reason for IList to still be around is for reasons of b
How to refer to the locations in lower depths of a waterbody (such kakım a lake)? more hot questionsBu şekilde listelerin birbirini point etmesi ve bandajlı listenin elemanlarına kıymetiharbiye verilmesi sağlanmaktadır.Edit: You do need to be quick to get answers in here. Kakım I presented a slightly different syntax to the other answers, I
MarkusMarkus 22k44 gold badges3333 silver badges5959 bronze badges 1 I prefer your solution, because it causes no runtime overhead and tankes place only in tests.The comparer doesn't handle Dictionary, since you're only looking for IList; if you started looking for IEnumerable (and added a special case for KeyValuePair) it would handle dictionaries